We always have to eat in our lives, and we use chopsticks when we eat, but we all know that the chopsticks we often use have thousands of years of history and culture. According to biologists, people The first thing that comes to mind when you are hungry is that these two sticks are used as tableware. So why do foreign people still insist on not using chopsticks? After all, chopsticks have appeared more than 3,000 years ago.
After the chopsticks appeared, they quickly spread to North Korea, Japan, and other regions. However, during the Warring States period, there were historical records. In fact, the tableware we used at that time was not only the existence of chopsticks but also the existence of cutlery.
At that time, people not only used chopsticks when they ate but even used a knife and fork to help cut the meat, which is very similar to the current Western countries.
However, after Qin Guo unified the world, the record of the knife and fork slowly disappeared, but according to historian research, it was actually because the social state at that time was stabilized, so people pursued food in the context of living and working in peace. It is getting higher and higher.
Therefore, they no longer need to use the knife and fork to help eat, so the knife and fork are gradually forgotten as a product of the backwardness of the times, and the chopsticks have been made in this war without smoke victory.
This is mainly because chopsticks are the most convenient dining tool, so the chopsticks are gradually spread to the present. As for why foreigners do not use chopsticks? This is because their eating habits are different from ours.
Many foreigners think that food is used to fill the hunger, so they prefer to eat large pieces of beef and meat such as chicken, so they don't have much demand for cooking, because The meat cuts of the pieces are more convenient to eat with the knife and fork, so the foreigners will use the knife and fork. Do you not think that the chopsticks are actually the species that wins in the environment of the survival of the fittest?
Comments